I'm curious about the order of priority regarding cached pages for logged in users.
In the prefs, you can select "Don't cache pages for logged in users", which makes total sense. However, I do have certain pages that are static and wouldn't be different for logged in user.
Is the Cache exception list respected for logged in users? In other words, is a cached page ALWAYS served if it is listed in this section...even if a user is logged in? In other words, what is the priority of determining if the cache is used -- does logged in take priority or this section.
It seems as though it isn't, but I'd like to get a confirmation on this before I build my own caching mechanism.